The Law Gazette
5th September 2002
Law firms call in ex-SAS personnel to
spy on staff and eavesdrop potential clients - By Jeremy
Fleming
Some law firms tap staff phones to find
out whether they are having affairs with secretaries or moonlighting,
and eavesdrop rivals in pubs to gain sensitive information,
an Intelligence consultant told the Gazette this week.
Alex Bomberg, managing Director of security
company International Intelligence, said he acted for a number
of firms-including major city practices-which
typically use his services to carry out surveillance on directors
of prospective clients.
This sometimes involves staff eavesdropping
on rival firms lawyers at bars and in restaurants,
where they may discuss business and clients.
He said: "phone tapping itself is
illegal, but not if the owner of the phones is monitoring
the calls of employees. It is sometimes done internally within
law firms to monitor whether partners are having affairs
with their secretaries, but mostly to see if staff are working
for non-clients on the side"
Mr Bomberg, whose firm is staffed by former
SAS and civil and military security services personnel, said,
"we sent ex SAS personnel with a law firm to South Africa
on
a litigation matter recently to protect the solicitors and
barristers on the case"
Security reviews, which cost £4000,
take form of an "attack", carried out by international
intelligence staff. "We agree a two-week period during
which we will attack the firm, attempt to steal sensitive
documents, hack their computer systems and generally try
to discover as much information as possible. Afterwards we
pinpoint the weaknesses," Mr Bomberg said.
He said he had carried out such attacks
on 15 firms, and said that many have lax security: "I know
for a fact that three major well-known city law firms dump
whole files in their bins. And if you ask any solicitor to
rummage through his secretaries bins at the end of day, I
guarantee that most of them will find copies of (confidential)
correspondence."
Ed Nally, deputy vice-president of the
Law Society, said that monitoring internal communications
would be ethical so long as proper warnings were in place
and it was carried out for proper management purposes.
|